Consider a great conductor leading an orchestra in the throes of a majestic symphony.
Now consider a metronome, a soulless mechanism for keeping time.
Do you think they’re doing the exact same job?
Would you replace Bernstein or Karajan with a glorified clock?
The machine does have some serious advantages over the human; it’s more precise, more efficient and more reliable. It is infinitely cheaper than the human. It doesn’t get sick, doesn’t throw tantrums and has no ego to deal with.
No-one would seriously let a metronome lead the Berlin or London Philharmonic through Swan Lake or The Messiah, let alone the Ring of the Nibelung… because we all realise the crucial human talents required.
We can sense the passion that drives every move of the baton, the intellect that studied every note of every instrument, the comprehension that synthesises each tiny detail into a seamless, magnificent whole. We can appreciate the commitment that powers every rehearsal and the creative energy that drives every performance.
Machines outperform humans in any task that can be reduced to a number of known, predictable steps; they’re better at routine than we are, better at jobs that require no interpretation or invention.
We’re better at jobs that are changing. We’re better at reading shifts in meaning or context. We’re better at feeling the practical and emotional needs of our fellow humans, better at adapting to new situations, better at solving problems that aren’t covered in the rule book.
If your job doesn’t require empathy, creativity, passion, ingenuity or sensitivity, get one that does.
Because you deserve better.
And because you’re probably keeping a machine out of a job. For now.
dave isles
interpretation and invention are keys to human progress, i reckon Jason.
machines that can only go by the rule book will produce more of the same..
quicker/cheaper/better arguably.. but i’d rather pay a bit more for the ‘hand made product’.
i have a personal battle with machine driven interpretation.. it produces ‘stuff’ while the operators go for coffee.. and they know not what the machine is telling them.. they assume that the ‘answers’ are ‘correct’… I’m still backing the human brain, heart and soul to deliver the best answers for humans!
cheers,Dave I
Jason
Think of Flight 1549 losing altitude over New York in 2009. None of the autopilot’s predetermined emergency protocols would have averted a crash so Captain Sullenberger had to quickly think of something the plane’s programmers hadn’t: how to land a fully loaded Airbus A320 onto a river. Machines are brilliant at executing existing plans while humans are brilliant at making new plans up. That’s still our edge, right Dave?
dave isles
thanks for the further inspiration, Jason-
i will fight on! cheers