Capital compromise.

Jason Clarke

When two conflicting ideas lock horns it’s a good time to step back from the battle and invent some fresh possibilities; if neither option generates enough support to survive a vote then it’s a sure sign we need better ideas.

But that takes time, enthusiasm and fresh brains (things you don’t often find in people who are exhausted after a protracted fight) which might be why most battles of this kind opt for the ‘middle road’ compromise in which nobody has to lose out because nobody actually gets what they want.

Once upon a time, Australia was a nation without a capital city, even though it had two excellent contenders for the title; a simple coin toss would have given the young country a world-class capital. Unfortunately, neither Sydney nor Melbourne was prepared to forego the honour; it was a classic deadlock, pure and simple.

But rather than come up with better solutions, Australia chose a site halfway between the two cities, literally in the middle of nowhere.

Picture1

A city with no good reason to be where it is, Canberra is a fitting monument to stubbornness, a powerful reminder of the kind of mediocrity you get when there are only two sides and neither knows how to step back and think again.

It’s how Canberra began, it’s how it works… and why it doesn’t.

Want to keep reading?

More Articles about Decision Making

Weapons of Mass Distraction.

Common reasoning errors known as ‘fallacies’ can be easy to spot.

True or False?

There will always be more stories but there is only ever one truth. Let’s find it.

Passion victims.

I used to stage operas for a living. It taught me a lot about passion. Every night we told stories […]

Uninformed decision.

Why do we feel capable of making important decisions about complex issues with little or no knowledge?

Return of the Zombie.

Every institution has at least one zombie: a project that never quite got up but never really went away either.

Hazard ahead.

It’s always the things we didn’t imagine that are our undoing.